🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has declared it is pursuing compensation totaling $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This move constitutes a clear warning from the Kremlin against proposals to use frozen Russian state funds to support Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

Based on reports in local state media, the monetary authority initiated a lawsuit last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This figure corresponds to the stated $230 billion claim.

EU leaders will decide in the coming days on a plan to leverage approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. The proposal entails providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its military and economic stability.

The vast majority of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the primary custodian for the Russian frozen sovereign wealth.

Dispute on Ownership

EU officials have argued that their proposal is on solid legal ground. They argue rests on the fact that ownership of the state assets remains with Russia, despite being it was frozen in European jurisdictions shortly after the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has called any utilization of the funds as illegal appropriation. Authorities have threatened retaliatory actions, including seizing European private investors' assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has taken on a prominent role in diplomatic talks, wrote on X that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its assets. He warned that the EU, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.

Wider Implications

With statements interpreted as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the proposal as "a vicious assault on property rights and the international reserves system created by the United States."

The clearing house refused to comment on the latest lawsuit. It has previously noted it is facing more than 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.

Enforcement Challenges

Although courts in EU countries are unlikely to recognize rulings from Russian tribunals, analysts expect Moscow to seek enforcement in countries with stronger relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly nations, if relevant holdings can be identified," stated a lawyer from an international firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials said they are developing measures to discourage other nations from aiding any Russian legal action against European entities. They are also crafting safeguards to shield EU countries with assets in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

Under the complex scheme, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the cash earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would remain untouched.

Ukraine would only be obligated to return the money if and when Russia agreed to pay reparations for the vast destruction caused during the ongoing war.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an different method for financing Ukraine. This involves joint EU borrowing to fund a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the European budget.

Such a proposal, however, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has already expressed its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, described the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible option" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian frozen assets, meaning it is not drawn from our public funds, which is equally significant," she stated. "It also sends a clear message that when you do all this destruction to another country, you have to pay for the rebuilding."