🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an event that started out as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, expanding to include functions where individuals of African heritage are compensated to talk to predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Month

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the middle of February. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in autumn in the UK, Deutschland, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has developed since its inception, placing less emphasis on the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the celebration is observed is a reflection of the current political situation. How it evolves is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the objective of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how important it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the warmer months we witnessed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the history of Britain. a prominent political figure, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a situation where a legislator feels emboldened to state that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are growing in the EU as a entirety.

In the United States, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the nation. A effort to scrub the history of people of color and narrative from the records is ongoing. One of Donald Trump's initial presidential directives aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the observance represents how insufficiently it can be effective if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content celebrations of historical achievements, rather than challenging the realities of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its short period means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is required. Denise Miller, a educator at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she stated, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to adjust, modify and expand actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just discontinue events including Black History Month completely, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an era that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an framework that a significant effort has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out through the year (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not avoid governmental matters, and provides room for citizens, particularly the younger generation, to air their fears and experiences. What value has basic knowledge of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Establishments who observe it should not be reassured with the passive language of hidden discrimination and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but faced with the dangers that impact society if fight against prejudice is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and reactive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.